Hi everyone,
John (jwyvern in Reply #49) said
“Will, I think different people are interpreting your rules differently and some of the rankings being given are apples versus oranges. As it stands it's all very confusing”. Yes, I agree… things have got a bit more complicated than I had expected! My reason for having started such a survey in the first place was the result of the sheer joy I’m currently experiencing with my recently acquired T5/76.. and thinking how could anything (or more to the point, the Genos) possibly be better than it! And if that was, indeed, possible… then by HOW much. Hence the scale of zero to 10 points. And it seemed at the time that I wasn’t alone in my assumption that it was a simple enough method, as Alan (Reply #4) said:
“You ask a very interesting question” and
“A good post Will”.
However, it seems that not everyone has quite understood what I wanted to know (which has resulted in bit of confusion). The majority, on the other hand, have given me exactly what I was looking for. Some have taken a slightly different angle (but equally as helpful) by giving both T5 and Genos a score (0-10) in terms of excellence. For example, Spirit of the old South (Reply #54) says:
“Genos is almost perfect. So that´s a 9. Tyros 5 is still a very good instrument. So that´s a 7”. Another poster who even went ‘over the call of duty’ was Soundphase (Reply #10), who supplied a detailed account of how he had arrived at his total score of 6/10 improvement margin over a T5!
So I’d like to say a big Thank You to all who have participated in this little survey so far (but continue by all means if you feel you have more to add). I’m now beginning to get a little picture of how much of an improvement the Genos
(REALLY) is over my T5. But let’s just say for the moment that the way I perceive that ‘picture’ is that my T5/76 is pretty tight on Genos’ heels.....
in the areas/features that interests me. I may, therefore, be hanging on to it a while longer than the 18-24 months originally specified!
Regards,
Will